Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel had no instructions and no representation was presented to the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.12.17 18:00:56 +0530
2025:CGHC:61384
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 153 of 2018
Gajanand Sahu s/o Late Shri Vishal Ram Sahu, Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Pahanda, Tahsil P. S. Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s)
versus
Respondents- 1 to 3 are R/o Village- Pahanda, Post- Bhurka, Tahsil- Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
5 - Tamin Bai, W/o Chamman Lal Sahu, R/o Village Pahanda, Post Bhurka, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ...Respondents
(Cause title is taken from the CIS)
| For Appellant | : Shri Satish Surya , Advocate on behalf of Shri Yogesh Pandey, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent/State | : Shri Rajeev Bharat, GA |
| For Respondents-1 to 3 and 5 | : Shri Alok Nigam, Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board
16.12.2025
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE
padma
Gajanand Sahu
Chamman Lal Sahu
Santram Sahu
Lileshwar Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh
Tamin Bai
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
