4. Learned counsel for the victim/objector vehemently oppose the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, and would submit that in the present case, the allegation of rape upon the minor victim, aged about 14 years, is alleged on the juvenile applicant, aged about 15 years 11 months, who is also a student of the same school, where the victim is studying. The manner in which the victim was subjected to rape by the applicant that he took her on the pretext that other teacher of the school are calling her, and took her to a lonely place in the school, where there is no CC TV coverage, so that he could escape from the offence. Thereafter, even he committed rape upon her in her house itself, after giving threatening to her. By the act of the applicant, the victim went in depression, and avoiding going to school, and tuition. Father of the applicant is in Police service, and he threatened the victim that no one will take action against the applicant, as he is the son of a Police Officer. He would further submit that whenever she disclosed the incident to her teacher, they did not take care about her complaint. When the victim was being taken to the Psychiatrist for counseling, she disclosed the entire incident to her, and then, the report has been lodged. Although the merits of the case and gravity of the offence would not be relevant for consideration of bail application of a juvenile, but in the facts and circumstances of the present case, releasing the applicant on bail would defeat the ends of justice, as the victim is apprehending untoward incident from the applicant. It is also submitted that the applicant was medically examined by the District Medical Board,
