Petitioner challenged the NDPS trial court's order permitting late production of the Mukhbir Suchna Panchnama as Ex. P/54. The High Court held the trial court committed no illegality and dismissed the petition, directing expeditious conclusion of the pending trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2025:CGHC:3618 NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 233 of 2025
Mandeep Sharma S/o Satveer Sharma Aged About 34 Years R/o Milgor, Aman Nagar, Hisar, Ps City Kotwali, Hisar Haryana
... Petitioner
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate, Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate For State : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge
Order on Board
21.01.2025
2
reasoning so given and was pleased to take such document on record of the case and permitted the same to be marked as Ex. P/54.
(Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge
alfiza
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court erred in taking the Mukhbir Suchna Panchnama on record at a late stage as Ex. P/54 during the IO's examination.
Whether the impugned order accepting the belatedly produced document was illegal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mandeep Sharma
State of Chhattisgarh Through the District Magistrate, Raipur Chhattisgarh
Arvind Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
