Disposed¶27

Chandrabhan Gendley v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Sept 2025CRMP/1635/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; CRMP No. 1635 of 2025; Section 528 BNSS; closure of prosecution evidence; Criminal Case No.206/2011, JMFC Takhatpur; Criminal Revision No.161/2024; order dated 10.02.2025; expeditious trial direction; Sourabh Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh, CRMP No.1690 of 2025 (08-08-2025); disposed of on 18.09.2025 by Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.; advocates Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi and Pranjal Shukla.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in similar terms to CRMP No.1690 of 2025: trial court to expedite and conclude the trial expeditiously; prosecution wing and petitioners to render full cooperation. ¶27

Chandrabhan Gendley Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:48118

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

CRMP No. 1635 of 2025

¶6

1 - Chandrabhan Gendley S/o Rupkumar Gendley Aged About 33 Years R/o Sagar Homes, Nature City, P.S. Sakri Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶7

2 - Lav Dewangan S/o Vijendra Kumar Dewangan, R/o Karbala Road, Juna Bilaspur, P.S. City Kotwali Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶8

... Petitioners

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Incharge Police Station Takhatpur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶13

For Petitioners	: Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate.
For State	: Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer.
	Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board

¶14

18.09.2025

¶15

The present petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed against the order dated 10.02.2025 passed by 3^rd Additional Sessions Judge, District Bilaspur (CG) in Criminal Revision No.161/2024 arising out of order dated 19.07.2024 passed by the JMFC, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur in Criminal Case No.206/2011.

¶16

The petitioners/accused filed an application before the JMFC, Takhatpur for closure of prosecution evidence which was rejected vide order dated 19.07.2024. Against the said order, the petitioners preferred a revision i.e. Criminal Revision No.161/2024 which was dismissed by learned 3nd Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, District – Bilaspur (C.G.) vide impugned order dated 10.02.2025 leading to the filing of this petition.

¶17

Digitally signed byMOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2025.09.19 20:55:50 +0530

¶18

¶19

Learned counsel for the State as well learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that one of the co-accused Sourabh Sahu in Criminal Case No.206/2011 filed CRMP No.1690 of 2025 which has been disposed of by the coordinate Bench of this Court and the direction for expeditious trial of the case has already been issued in the case concerned.

¶20

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed with the petition.

¶21

The petition filed by the co-accused has been disposed of by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08-08-2025 passed in CRMP No.1690 of 2025 wherein in para 3 to 7 it has been observed that :-

¶22

“3. The trial is going on since September, 2011. There are total 53 witnesses out of which, as per learned counsel for petitioner, only 15 witnesses have been examined till date. Trial is taking consideration time for its conclusion.

¶23

4 Taking these facts into consideration, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and ensure that the trial is concluded as expeditiously as possible.

¶24

The prosecution wing and the petitioner are also directed to render full cooperation in expeditious conclusion of the trial.

¶25

Accordingly, the present CRMP stands disposed of .

¶26

The Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order forthwith to the trial Court concerned as well as the prosecution wing for necessary information.”

¶27

In view of the aforesaid direction and observation made in CRMP No.1690 of 2025 (Sourabh Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh) vide order dated 08-08-2025, the present petition is disposed of in the similar terms.

¶28

Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)

¶29

Aadil

Chandrabhan Gendley v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrabhan Gendley v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mathura Gir Vs State of Chhattisgarh

V. Kumar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

S. Shakti Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Abhishek Sonkar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Khilesh Kumar Banjare Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Meera Pandey @ Uma Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh