Disposed¶7

Vishram Yadav and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC5 Oct 2025CRA/160/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; CRA No.160 of 2007; Vishram Yadav and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh; order sheet dated 06.10.2025; appellants produced from Central Jail, Raipur in compliance with order dated 20.08.2025; presence marked and remanded to jail; matter heard finally with consent of counsel; judgment passed separately; Judge: Rajani Dubey.

What did the court decide?

Interim procedural directions only: presence of the appellants was marked and they were sent to the concerned jail; the matter was heard finally with the judgment to be passed separately. ¶7

Vishram Yadav and Others Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 / 1

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶3

CRA No.160 of 2007

¶4

VISHRAM YADAV AND OTHERS versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

¶5

Order Sheet

¶6

Digitally signed by R NIRALA

¶7

06/10/2025	Mr. Pragalbha Sharma and Ms. Itu Rani Mukherjee, counsel for the appellants. Ms. Nand Kumari Kashyap, PL for the State. In compliance of the order dated 20.08.2025, the appellants have been arrested and produced before this Court by Head Constable No.1291 Jahagir Khan, Constable No.807 Dageshwar Gaikwad, Constable No.1868 Shivnandan Sahu and Constable No.233 Shankar Dayal from Central Jail, Raipur. Their presence be marked and they be sent to the concerned jail. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. However, judgment has been passed separately. Sd/-
Nirala	Rajani Dubey Judge

06/10/2025

Mr. Pragalbha Sharma and Ms. Itu Rani Mukherjee,
counsel for the appellants.
Ms. Nand Kumari Kashyap, PL for the State.
In compliance of the order dated 20.08.2025, the
appellants have been arrested and produced before this
Court by Head Constable No.1291 Jahagir Khan, Constable
No.807 Dageshwar Gaikwad, Constable No.1868
Shivnandan Sahu and Constable No.233 Shankar Dayal
from Central Jail, Raipur.
Their presence be marked and they be sent to the
concerned jail.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties,
the matter is heard finally. However, judgment has been
passed separately.
Sd/-

Nirala

Rajani Dubey
Judge

Vishram Yadav and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishram Yadav and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parshuram Dewangan (Died) through Lrs Vs Union of India

Ghurmin Tandan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Virendra Netam Vs Union of India

Abdul Samud @ Imamuddin Vs State of Chhattisgarh

R.l. Shrivastava And Another Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ramnarayan Vs Avinash Champavat