Dismissed¶16

Virendra Bahadur Singh v. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma

Contempt – withdrawal of contempt petition

Chhattisgarh HC29 Jun 2025CONT/362/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CONT No. 362 of 2025, Virendra Bahadur Singh v. Ramesh Kumar Sharma and others, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 30-06-2025 by Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal. Contempt petition arising out of WP(C) No.773/2025 dismissed as withdrawn on I.A. No.02/2025 after counsel stated the order under contempt had been complied with and the petition had become infructuous. No statute or precedent discussed; no monetary relief.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal application I.A. No.02/2025 allowed; contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn. ¶16

Virendra Bahadur Singh Vs Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:CGHC:28973

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

CONT No. 362 of 2025

¶5

1 - Virendra Bahadur Singh (Proprietor M/s Baijnath Food Product Mill) S/o Gyaneshwar Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o Plot No. 775/2 Ward No. 11, Schoolpara, Kasaundi District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.)

¶6

versus

¶7

1 - Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Market Federation Maryadit Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.)

¶8

2 - Mr. Akash Chhikara Collector (Food Department ) Janjgir - Champa District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.)

¶9

3 - Mr. Vijay Brala D.G.M. (Procurement), Food Corporatin Of India (FCI) , Regional Office Mova Vidhan Sabha Marg, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶12

For Petitioner	: Ms. Deblina Maity, Advocate.
For Respondents No.1	Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Advocate.
For RespondentNo.3	: Mr. R.S. Patel,Advocate.
Hon'ble	Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board

¶13

30-06-2025

¶14

Heard on I.A. No.02/2025, application for withdrawal of the present contempt petition arising out of WP(C) No.773/2025.

¶15

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the order under contempt has already been complied with and now the present contempt petition has become infructuous.

¶16

On the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons mentioned in the application, I.A. No.02/2025 is allowed and the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶17

Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge

¶18

Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN

¶19

Aadil

Virendra Bahadur Singh v. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virendra Bahadur Singh v. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vishnu Narayan Tiwari Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Kumar Jadit Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

M/s Tirupati Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S Tirupati Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Madhu Agrawal (Proprietor - M/S Madhu Enterprises) Vs Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma