Dismissed¶¶25

Prakash Chand Nishad v. Pitamaber and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC13 Oct 2025ACQA/77/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; ACQA No. 77 of 2011; appellant Prakash Chand Nishad (Kanker); respondents led by Pitamaber Parkar (Ziladhyaksha, C.G. Nishad Kenwat Samaj) with nine others; order dated 14.10.2025 by Justice Radhakishan Agrawal; dismissal for non-prosecution/default due to complete absence of appearance or representation by parties in the second round of hearing; no counsel for either side; no substantive adjudication, no statute or precedent discussed; header marked 'NAFR'.

What did the court decide?

In the absence of any representation, the Court held it had no other option but to dismiss the case for non-prosecution. ¶¶24

Prakash Chand Nishad Vs Pitamaber and Ors. — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Digitally signed by SAURABH SAURABH YADAV YADAV Date: 2025.10.14 16:49:37 +0530

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

ACQA No. 77 of 2011

¶5

Prakash Chand Nishad S/o Sukchand, Caste: Kenwat, aged about 27 years, R/o Village: Daspur, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶6

... Appellant

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. Pitamaber Parkar S/o Late Raisingh, Caste: Kenwat, aged about 44 years, Ziladhyaksha, C.G. Nishad Kenwat Samaj, Kanker, R/o Village: Daspur, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶9

2. Dukhwaram Nishad S/o Rama Kenwat, aged about 50 years, R/o Village: Bewrati, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶10

3. Jayantlal Nishad S/o Not Known, aged about 45 years R/o Village: Daspur, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶11

4. Jayluram Nishad S/o Not Known, aged about 35 years, R/o Village: Barkai, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶12

5. Nakulram Nishad S/o Not Known R/o Village: Kotalbhatti, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶13

6. Shrawan Kumar S/o Manrakhan, aged about 33 years, R/o Village: Bewrati, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶14

7. Vishnuram S/o Parasram, aged about 42 years, R/o Village: Daspur, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶15

8. Dhanaji Nishad S/o Not Known, aged about 50 years, R/o Village: Sarona, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶16

9. Bhukhauram S/o Jhagruram, aged about 45 years, R/o Village: Daspur, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶17

10. Mohan S/o Jhagruram, aged about 37 years, R/o Village: Daspur, District: Kanker (C.G.)

¶18

... Respondent(s)

¶19

__________________________________________________________________ For Appellant : None. For Respondents : None.

¶20

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

¶21

Order on Board

¶22

14.10.2025

¶23

1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the parties even when the case is called in the second round of hearing.

¶24

2. In the above circumstance, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this case for nonprosecution.

¶25

3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

( Radhakishan Agrawal ) JUDGE

¶28

Saurabh

Prakash Chand Nishad v. Pitamaber and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakash Chand Nishad v. Pitamaber and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.k.jain and Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Smt. Sumitra Singh Vs Anul Khan

State Of Chhattisgarh Vs Yogeshwar Sahu

Ashok Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

B.M. Distributors Vs M/S Govind Medical Agency

C.g. Environment Conservation Board Vs Shri P.k. Agrawal and Anr.