Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution after the appellant failed to appear on two consecutive hearing dates, indicating disinterest in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2025:CGHC:49889
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ACQA No. 350 of 2024
... Appellant
versus
... Respondent
For Appellant : None For Respondent : None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Judgment on Board
07.10.2025
1. Today, none appeared on behalf of the Appellant even when the case is taken up for hearing in second round and also considering that earlier on 17.09.2025, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant to argue the case, it appears that the appellant is not interested in this case.
2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this
Digitally signed by MANISH MANISH YADAV YADAV Date: 2025.10.07 18:24:19 +0530
2
Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge
Manish
Rameshwar Prasad Sahu
Abha Sahu
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
