Allowed

Smt. Sheetal Jain v. Smt. Rajni @ Ranjana Acharya

Chhattisgarh HC1 Sept 2025ACQA/20/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an acquittal appeal by relying on the Supreme Court's Celestium Financial judgment, which recognizes a complainant in a cheque dishonour case as a victim. The Court reserved liberty for the appellant to file an appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C. within 60 days. The limitation period was explicitly waived for such appeals.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of; liberty reserved for appellant to file appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C. within 60 days with no insistence on limitation.

Smt. Sheetal Jain Vs Smt. Rajni @ Ranjana Acharya — Cheque Dishonour | Chhattisgarh HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

ACQA No. 20 of 2024

¶5

1 - Smt. Sheetal Jain W/o Shri Manish Jain Aged About 38 Years Through Power of Attorney Holder Manish Jain At B-104, First Floor, Arihant Heights, Bhirav Nagar, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶6

... Appellant

¶7

versus

¶8

1 - Smt. Rajni @ Ranjana Acharya W/o Shri Mahesh Acharya, Aged About 52 Years Proprietor Shagun At HIG-24, Sector 2, Shankar Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶9

... Respondent

¶10

For Appellant : Mr. Akash Mishra, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Mayank Kumar, Adv.

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

¶12

Judgment on Board

¶13

02/09/2025

¶14

1. This acquittal appeal U/s 378(4) of the Cr.P.C. has been filed against the judgment dated 24.08.2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur (C.G.) in Criminal Case No. 4040/2017 whereby the respondent/accused has been acquitted of the commission of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act.

¶15

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that recently the Supreme Court has delivered a judgment in the

¶16

Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2025.09.02 18:05:48 +0530

¶17

¶18

matter of M/s. Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804 holding that the complainant in a complaint filed under section 138 of the Act of 1881 is also a victim as defined in section 2(wa) of Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 2(y) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short the “BNSS”). He submits that the Supreme Court has further held that the complainant in a complaint under section 138 of the Act of 1881 can also be entitled to file an appeal under proviso to section 372 Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 413 of the BNSS. Learned counsel submits that the case may be disposed of reserving liberty so as to avail the said remedy.

¶19

3. In view of the aforesaid submission and considering the law declared in the matter of Celestium Financial (supra), this Appeal stands disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the appellant to file an appeal within a period of 60 days from this order before the appropriate Court, in accordance with law. It is further made clear that if such an appeal is filed before the concerned Court within the time given by this Court, it would not insist upon the limitation while deciding the same and will proceed to decide the same in accordance with law.

¶20

4. Registry shall return the certified copy of the impugned judgment/order and relevant documents to counsel for the appellant after retaining the photocopy of the same.

¶21

5. Registry shall send back the record to the concerned Court.

¶22

Sd/(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge

¶23

H.L. Sahu

Smt. Sheetal Jain v. Smt. Rajni @ Ranjana Acharya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sheetal Jain v. Smt. Rajni @ Ranjana Acharya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Singh Vs Sandeep Kumar Nishad

Ramnaresh Chakradhari Vs Paltu Ram Sinha

J.P. Pandey (Died) through Lrs. Vs Tarun Kumar Sharma

Shree Deo Diwedi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dileep Thapa Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shashank Bajpai Vs Subhanshu Shukla