Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their writ petition as infructuous on account of efflux of time. The Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition on those terms.
Permission to withdraw the petition as infructuous was granted and the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 6721 of 2010
1 . Shriram Khare, S/o Shri Jodhiya Ram Khare, aged about 36 years, R/o Village Makeri, Post Rosouta, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir- Champa (CG)
2. Ram Naresh Burman, S/o Shri Dhaniram Burman, aged about - years, R/o Village Dhangaon, Post Rasonta, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG)
3. Balram Dheevar, S/o Shri Babulal Dheever, aged about 35 years, R/o Donga Khhrod, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG)
4. Sachin Singh Chandel, S/o Shri Gajendra Singh, aged about 33 years, R/o Village Kosa, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG)
5 . Resham Lal Yadav, S/o Shri Bisahu Ram Yadav, aged about 40 years, R/o Village Lagara, P.O. Pakariya, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG)
2. Collector, (Mission Director), District Janjgir-Champa (CG)
3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG)
---- Respondents
(Cause-title is taken from Case Information System)
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Ms. Anju Ahuja, Advocate. |
|---|
| For State : Mr. B. D. Guru, Addl. A. G. |
| For Respondent No. 3 : None, though served. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board |
02.07.2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, present
2. No objection from the other side.
3. Permission granted.
4. Consequently, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn being rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Ajinkya
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and if permission to withdraw should be granted.
Shriram Khare
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
