Disposed

Kailash Singh Bakde v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC22 Sept 2024WPS/5893/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner teacher sought upgraded pay scale and pending dues citing established judgment. Court allowed representation to respondent No. 4 within 30 days, directing authorities to consider the representation and relevant circulars within 120 days without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Permitting petitioner to file representation within 30 days; directing respondent No. 4 to consider same within 120 days.

Kailash Singh Bakde Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2024)

1 / 3

2024:CGHC:37312

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 5893 of 2024

¶6

1 - Kailash Singh Bakde S/o Shri Laxman Singh Bakde Aged About 50 Years Initially Appointed Shikshakarmi Class-3, Primary School Bhaluguda, Block Bakawand, District Bastar Jagdalpur, Presently Working As Teacher (Lb), Middle School Karpawand, Block Bakawand, District Bastar Jagdalpur, R/o Village And Post Jaitgiri, Tahsil Karpawand, District Bastar Chhatttisgarh Pin 494222, Mb. 9406474316

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department (E And T), Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Tahsil Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶10

2 - Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Tahsil Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶11

3 - Director Public Education, Directorate Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Tahsil Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶12

4 - District Education Officer Bastar In The Office Of The District Education Officer Bastar, District Bastar Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

5 - Block Education Officer Bakawand Block Bakawand, District Bastar Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh

¶14

6 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat, Bastar, District Bastar Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr. Vijay K. Deshmukh, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Aman Tamboli, P.L.

¶17

Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Order on Board

23/09/2024

2 / 3

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s):-

¶22

10.1 This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to produce/summon the entire record pertaining to the petitioner's case. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned authority ie, respondent no. R/4 to R/6 to comply the annexure P/3 and P/6 about the Upgraded Pay Scale for the present petitioner.

¶23

10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned authority ie, respondent no. R/4 to R/6 to give the 1^st Upgraded Pay Scale being completed 10 years service and petitioner being completed 19 years

¶24

service.

¶25

10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned authority i.e, respondents to give about similar Pay Scale being similar situated employee by calculating the pending Upgraded Pay Scale as per the circulars P/3 dated 02/11/2011, 06/04/2019 (क्रमांक एफ 12-3/2018/20-दो) and 06/04/2019 (क्रमांक/पंचा./शि�क्षा/2019/272) etc. issued by the respondent department.

¶26

10.5 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned authority to pay the total pending amount about the Upgraded Pay Scale with interest in the limited period.

¶27

10.6 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deems fit and appropriate.

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023 judgment dated 28.02.2024. He submits that the respondents may be directed to consider the case of the petitioner in light of judgment of Smt. Sona Sahu (supra).

¶29

Learned counsel for the respondents -State submits that if the petitioner make a representation for the grievances, the State authority would decide the same in accordance with law.

¶30

Be that as it may, at this stage this writ petition is disposed of permitting the

¶31

3 / 3

¶32

petitioner to make a representation within a period of 30 days to respondent No. 4 from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents No. 4/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular issued in this regard and also in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 120 days from the date of such representation. This Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case.

¶33

With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

(Sachin Singh Rajput)

¶36

JUDGE

¶37

H.Ansari

Kailash Singh Bakde v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Singh Bakde v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukund Madhav Singh Kanwar, Vs Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited

Deepak Shendey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sameer Bairagi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pekhan Tondre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mamta Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Aakash Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh