Vikram Singh Vimal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No substantive legal proposition is discussed as the order is purely procedural.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No substantive legal proposition is discussed as the order is purely procedural.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:CGHC:40423
Digitally signed by ANKIT ANKITKUMAR KUMAR SINGH SINGH Date:2024.10.17 10:43:58 +0530
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 5648 of 2016
... Petitioner
versus
3. Additional Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
For Petitioner :- Mr. Amit Nayak, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
15/10/2024
2
having become infructuous.
Sd/-
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Ankit
Vikram Singh Vimal
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court