Dismissed
Siyaram Verma v. Chhattisgarh State Co-operative and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWPS/4180/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4180 of 2013…
What the court decided
AI extract
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4180 of 2013…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 4180 of 2013
Siyaram Verma S/o Lt Shri Jairam Verma Aged About 66 Years R/o Bangalipara, Street No. 4, Sarkanda, Ps Sarkanda, Distt Bilaspur, Cg, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative And Ors S/o Marketing Federation Ltd, Through Managing Director, C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd, 880- Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur, Distt Raipur, Cg, Chhattisgarh
2. Managing Director C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd, 880-Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur, Distt Raipur, Cg, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Secretary C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd, 880-Civil Lines, Head Office Raipur, Distt Raipur, Cg, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. State Of C.G. Through Secretary, Department Of Cooperative Society, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Distt Raipur, Cg, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents
(Cause-title is taken from Case Information System)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : None, even in the second round.
For Respondents/ State : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. G. A.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board
11.07.2024
1. Today, when matter was taken up for hearing in second round, no one appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. It appears that petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter, consequently, present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Ajinkya
Siyaram Verma
Chhattisgarh State and 3 Ors.
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court