D. R. Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution after counsel stated he had no instructions to pursue the petition.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution after counsel stated he had no instructions to pursue the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:CGHC:41007
ANKIT KUMAR SINGH
Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Date: 2024.10.17 17:59:03 +0530
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 3623 of 2016
... Petitioner
versus
... Respondents
For Petitioner :- Mr. Harsh Dave, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate.
For Respondent-State :- Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
17/10/2024
2
Sd/-
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Ankit
D. R. Yadav
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Water Resource Department
Additional Secretary, Water Resource Department
Deputy Secretary, Water Resource Department
Executive Engineer, E & M Light Machinery Borewell and Gate Subdivision, Durg
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court