Writ petition dismissed as the petitioner's counsel reported no instructions, indicating the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:CGHC:31263
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 3435 of 2015
... Petitioner
versus
... Respondents
(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Siddharth Rathod, Advocate For State : Ms. Saumya Sharma, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
2 0.08.2024
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
$iddhant
Himanshu Singh Rana
State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Schedule Tribe and Schedule Caste Development Department
Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Dantewada
Balkrishna Wasnikar
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
