In this one-paragraph order, the High Court of ChhattisgarH disposed of the writ petition by relying on a prior judgment and directed the petitioners to be informed of the decision.
Petitioners to be informed of the decision in Faguvaram Patel case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 3065 of 2024
---- Petitioner
Versus
Page 2 of 2
For Petitioners : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Aman Tamboli, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board
14.06.2024
1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)].
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra).
3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge
Deshmukh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Faguvaram Patel and others Vs. State of ChhattisgarhRelied on¶23
Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)]
Darash Ram Kenwat and others
State of Chhattisgarh
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
