The petition seeking to quash objections to petitioner's eligibility for appointment as Sub Engineer Civil was dismissed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh because the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(S) No. 2400 of 2013
2
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Mr. G.P. Mathur, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
22.07.2024
“ 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the objection against the petitioner mentioned in the list of ineligible candidates and they may be considered for appointment for the post of Sub Engineer Civil, in the interest of justice.
10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deems fit and appropriate.”
3
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
vatti
Prasoon Soni and others
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
