Dismissed¶20

Vijay Kumar Kaushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC12 Mar 2024WPS/2151/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh; Sub-Inspector recruitment 2011; select list dated 11.05.2013; non-selection challenge; age relaxation; over-age; Shiksha Karmi; Rule 8(2) of the Rules of 2006; Circular dated 04/11/2006; Asger Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh, W.P.(S) No.2150/2013, order dated 20.09.2021; parity with earlier coordinate-bench decision; non-joinder of selected candidates; writ petition dismissed, no order as to costs; Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

None - writ petition dismissed with no order as to costs. ¶20

Vijay Kumar Kaushik Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors. — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 (WPS No. 2151 of 2013)

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2151 of 2013

¶4

Vijay Kumar Kaushik S/o Lt Shri R.P.Kaushik Aged About 38 Years R/o Vill Hafa, Po Sakri, Police Chowki Sakri, Civil And Revenue Distt Bilaspur, Cg, Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors S/o Through The Secretary, Deptt Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, Ps Rakhi, Civil And Revenue Distt Raipur, Cg, Chhattisgarh

¶8

The Director General Of Police Police Headquarter, Civil Line, Ps Civil Line, Civil And Revenue Distt Raipur Cg, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

---- Respondents

¶10

(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)

¶11

For Petitioner :- Mr. Suyash Dhar & Mr. Rajkumar Sahu, Counsel For State :- Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate

¶12

SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

¶13

13.03.2024

¶14

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner questioning the impugned select list dated 11.05.2013 (Annexure P/1) issued by the respondent No.2 to the extent of his non-selection to the post of Sub-Inspector in the recruitment held in the year 2011.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a similar writ petition bearing W.P.(S) No.2150/2013 (Asger Khan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Anr),

¶16

¶17

(WPS No. 2151 of 2013)

¶18

involving same issue has been decided by this Court vide order dated 20.09.2021, whereby in paragraph 7, it has been observed as under:-

¶19

“ 7. Reverting to the facts of the present case, admittedly, petitioner was holding the post of Shiksha Karmi by order dated 20/06/2008, as such, he was not entitled for age relaxation as per Rule 8(2) of the Rules of 2006 read with the Circular dated 04/11/2006. Admittedly and undisputedly, petitioner was aged about 33 years on the date of advertisement and as such, he was over-aged on the date of filing application, therefore, he was not eligible for selection on the post of Sub-Inspector and he has rightly not been selected and appointed on the said post. I do not find any perversity or illegality in the impugned select list (Annexure P/1) as the petitioner has failed to make out a case for interference. Even otherwise, the selected and appointed candidates have also not been made party/respondent in the writ petition, as such, I do not find any good ground to entertain this writ petition. ”

¶20

The aforesaid fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State and therefore in light of the aforesaid observations passed in Asger Khan (supra), this writ petition is dismissed. No order as to cost(s).

¶21

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶22

@d!t!

Vijay Kumar Kaushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar Kaushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravishankar Harpal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Elsemewar Tirkey Vs Chandradev Yadav

Subaso ( Since Dead) through Legal Representatives Vs Kamesari Bai ( Since Dead) through Legal Representatives

G.j.singh Vs Coal India Ltd. And Anr.

Ramkumar Chaturange And Anr. Vs Chhattisgarh State Power Distributor and Ltd. And Ors.

Alok Tiwari Vs Avinash Kumar Saran