Home Guard volunteers sought relief against State authorities; counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file afresh, and the writ petitions were disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions as and when occasion arises.
Petitions disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 1615 of 2018
Versus
--- Respondents.
With
WPS No. 1967 of 2018
Versus
---- Respondents.
(Cause title downloaded from CIS periphery)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr. Varunendra Mishra, Advocate. For State : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, GA.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board
19.01.2024
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw both the writ petitions with liberty to file fresh petition as and when occasion arises.
Considering the aforesaid submission, these petitions are
disposed off as withdrawn . However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file fresh petition as and when occasion so arises.
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Ajad
Sumeri Lal Sahu Siyaram Sahu
Asha Ram Dhurve
Pradeep Kumar Sinha
Krishna Ram Bare
Sujeet Kumar Mahobe
Vijay Kumar Banjare
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
