Dismissed¶18
Indal Singh Sidar v. The State Of ChhattisgaRH and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWPS/1656/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPS No. 1656 of 2014; petitioner Indal Singh Sidar (Assistant Teacher, Panchayat, Basna, Mahasamund); dismissed for want of prosecution on 08/04/2024 by Justice Goutam Bhaduri after no petitioner-side representation at the second calling; State counsel Abhishek Singh (Panel Lawyer); no statutes cited, no cases cited, no issues argued, no quantum involved; document is of procedural significance only (DWP for non-representation), not substantive precedent.
What did the court decide?
As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner even when the matter was called out in a second round, the Court had no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. ¶17