Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging labour court proceedings involving a retired employee. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the employee had retired prior to the decision.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to retirement of the employee respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1
2024:CGHC:37093
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPL No. 169 of 2015
... Petitioner.
versus
1 - Smt. Vrindavati Yadav W/o Santosh Yadav, R/o Chief Aaouse, Godripara, Chirmiri, District Koriya.
2 - Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Manendragarh, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate. For State : Shri Pramod Shrivastava, GA.
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Order on Board
20/09/2024
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
JUDGE
Avinash
Saraswati Shishu Mandir Through Vyavasthapak Mahesh Prasad Agrawal
Smt. Vrindavati Yadav
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Manendragarh
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
Avinash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
