1. Petitioners appointed under Section 49(8) of the Chhattisgarh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, do not possess a substantive right to hold office for an indefinite period. Their tenure is contingent upon the exercise of the power to appoint, which includes the concomitant power of removal under the doctrine of pleasure.
2. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies has the power to remove non-official Prescribed Officers without assigning reasons or providing an opportunity of hearing. The statutory mechanism under Rule 43-B specifically contemplates removal without such formalities.
3. The principles of natural justice and audi alteram partem do not apply to the removal of such nominated members. The doctrine of pleasure permits termination at any time without stated cause, as these appointments confer no legal or fundamental right akin to employment under Part XIV of the Constitution.
4. Petitioners cannot claim equality under Article 14 of the Constitution with elected members of the board, as they fall into a distinct class of appointed officials. The right to equality applies to equals, not unequals.
5. The failure to conduct elections within the stipulated period renders it impermissible to allow appointed officers to continue in office indefinitely. The authority approving nomination has the equal power to remove the nominee if no election is held.
6. The impugned orders of removal were passed within the four corners of the statute, were not stigmatic in nature, and did not commit any error of law, leading to the dismissal of the petitions.