Petitioners sought to pursue a writ matter against state revenue and forest authorities; counsel submitted the petition had become infructuous with passage of time, and the court dismissed it as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 839 of 2015
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)
2
For Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Prasad, Advocate For State : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. Government Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
1 5.07.2024
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
$iddhant
Sethua S/o Rovan
Vaysakhoa S/o Rovan
Jethua S/o Rovan
Mithua S/o Rovan
Shikari S/o Rovan
Gokul S/o Deva
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
