Uddhav Prasad Tiwari and Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; W.P.(C)/WPC No. 6171 of 2011; petitioners Uddhav Prasad Tiwari and Sukesh Tiwari v. State of Chhattisgarh, CSIDC, Collector Raigarh, LAO-cum-SDO Raigarh, DTIC Raigarh and Jindal Steel and Power Ltd.; dismissal for want of prosecution / non-prosecution for lack of client instructions; order dated 07.10.2024; Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad; NAFR; counsel Harsh Verma (for Hamida Siddiqui) reported no instructions; no merits adjudication, statutes or precedents; not suitable as a substantive legal authority.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition (W.P.(C)) is dismissed for want of prosecution, appearing counsel having reported that he had no instructions from the petitioners since long back and that they were perhaps not interested to pursue the case. ¶¶23