Jeet Ram Chandravanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Three connected writ petitions regarding co-operative society elections were disposed of in identical terms to a previously decided matter.
Three connected writ petitions regarding co-operative society elections were disposed of in identical terms to a previously decided matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 1040 of 2024
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Commissioner State Co-Operative, Election Commission Raipur, Mahila Thana Chowk, Chhotapara Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. The Collector Kabirdham, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
4. The Deputy Registrar Co-Operative Society Kabirdham, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
5. Rajkumar Kashyap Sr. Co-Operative Inspector/ Prescribed Officer Office Of Deputy Registrar, Co-Operative Society Kabirdham, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents
with
WPC No. 1052 of 2024
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Commissioner State Co-Operative Election Commission Raipur, Mahila Thana Chowk, Chhotapara, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Collector Sakti, District : Sakti, Chhattisgarh
4. Deputy Registrar Co-Operative Society Janjgir, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
5. Shri Vinod Sahu Supervisor / Prescribed Officer, Officer Of Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank
-2-
Maryadit Bilaspur, Branch- Baradwar, District : Sakti, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents
with
WPC No. 1056 of 2024
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2. Commissioner State Co-Operative Election Commission Raipur, Mahila Thana Chowk, Chhotapara Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
3. Collector Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)
4. Deputy Registrar Co-Operative Society Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)
5. Shri P.S. Dhruv Co-Operative Inspector/prescribed Officer, Office Of Deputy Registrar, Co-Operative Society, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)
---- Respondents
(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)
| For Respective Petitioners : | Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate Mr. Ritesh Verma, Advocate Mr. Santosh Bharat, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respective Respondents : |
Mr. Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate |
| Date of hearing : |
21.02.2024 |
| Date of Order : | 15.03.2024 |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
decided by this Court in WPC No.33 of 2024 in the matter of Horilal
-3-
Chouhan v. State of Chhattisgarh & others and other connected matters ,
delivered on 07.03.2024 , the present writ petitions are also disposed of in the same terms.
placed in the record of the present writ petitions.
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Nadim
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Horilal Chouhan v. State of ChhattisgarhFollowed¶40
WPC No.33 of 2024 in the matter of Horilal Chouhan v. State of Chhattisgarh & others and other connected matters
Jeet Ram Chandravanshi
State of Chhattisgarh
Sarju Sahu
Narendra Verma
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court