Petitioners challenged the Tribunal's refusal to release compensation kept in Fixed Deposit pursuant to an appellate court's direction in a pending MAC appeal. The High Court held the Tribunal could not vary the appellate order and dismissed the petition, granting liberty to seek relief in the pending appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 978 of 2023
Versus
(Cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent : None.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J. Order On Board
11.06.2024
2
(Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Sushila Jaddi) said amount was specifically directed to be kept in Fixed Deposit for certain period and said MAC is still pending consideration.
hereby dismissed .
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Ajay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Tribunal can modify an appellate order directing compensation to be kept in Fixed Deposit, and whether such order can be modified in a writ petition under Article 227.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Sushila Jaddi
Likita Jaddi
Smt. Bhagya Laxmi
Ashok Parekh
Nammu Ram Parekh
Shriram General Insurance Company Limited
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
