Rudani v. Kumar Say
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared on repeated calls.
What the court decided
1 / 2
2024:CGHC:44644
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
W.P(227) No. 934 of 2024
Rudani W/o Rambilas Aged About 50 Years R/o Village- Maheshpur, Tahsil - Latori, District- Surajpur ( C.G.). ... Petitioner
versus
1 - Kumar Say S/o Kendu Ram Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Maheshpur, Tahsil- Latori, District- Surajpur (C.G.).
2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Its Collector, Surajpur District-Surajpur ( C.G.). ... Respondents
Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2024.11.14 17:47:40 +0530
For Petitioner : None For : Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, PL. Respondent/State
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rudani W/o Rambilas
- respondent
Kumar Say S/o Kendu Ram
- respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Collector, Surajpur
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP227/934/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court