Dismissing the writ petition as infructuous on the ground of efflux of time without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(227) No. 727 of 2023
Asma Pahare W/o Himanshu Pahare, aged about 42 years, R/o C/o Sahettar Kurrey, Mohtara, Tahsil – Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner Versus Himanshu Pahare S/o Hemchand Pahare, aged about 32 years, R/o Sushil Shrivastava Gali, Behind Shivmandir, Agyenagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Petitioner : None For Respondent : Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate For Intervener : Mr. Gaurav Singhal, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
19.06.2024
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
vatti
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Asma Pahare
Himanshu Pahare
Unnamed Intervener
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
