Aditya Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Aditya Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh & others, W.P(227) No.493 of 2023, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 12.11.2024, 2024:CGHC:44076, NAFR. Writ petition dismissed as not pressed on the submission of counsel (Shri Siddharth Shukla) that the petition was not pressed; no merits adjudicated, no costs or quantum. Court below directed (in terms of hope and trust) to decide the main petition on its own merits without being influenced by observations in the interim order. Respondents included the Collector, Bilaspur; Chief General Manager, District Trade and Industries Centre; Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation; Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur; Director Town and Country Planning; and Khushbu Jaiswal. Useful only as a procedural precedent on withdrawal/non-prosecution of a writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Counsel for the petitioner submitted that he does not press the petition; accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.