Petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the counsel for the petitioner stated there was no instruction to argue the matter further.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP227 No. 30 of 2014
---- Petitioner
Versus
(Cause title downloaded from CIS periphery)
| --------------------------------- For Petitioner |
-------------------------------------------------------------- : Mr. Vishwanath Shrivas on behalf of |
|---|---|
| Mr. Paras Mani Shrivas, Advocate. | |
| For State | : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, PL. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board
15.06.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instruction in the case to argue the matter further.
Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is dismissed for want prosecution.
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Ajad
Dharam Lal And Ors.
Risdihin @ Safari Bai And Ors.
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
