In hearing an order, the court granted two weeks' time to the appellant's counsel to file an application for substitution of legal representatives. Final dismissal upon default was clarified.
Two weeks' time granted to move application for substitution of legal representatives
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No. 62 of 2015
Chhabiram versus Amar Singh and others
Order Sheet
| 17.09.2024 | Ms. Mamta Gendley, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, counsel for the appellant. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Khulesh Sahu, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 4. | |
| Ms. Gendley prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to move appropriate application for substitution of legal representatives of sole appellant. |
|
| Siddhant | It is made clear that by that time, if proper application is not moved, the appeal shall be dismissed without further reference to the Bench. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge |
Chhabiram
Amar Singh
others
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
