This single-page order dismisses a review petition in limine under Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007, finding no error apparent on the face of the impugned order dated 18-8-2023 in W.P.(S) No.2555/2023.
Review petition dismissed in limine with no order as to cost(s).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
(Rev.Pet.No.4/2024)
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Review Petition No.4 of 2024
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon’ble Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ.
Order (In Chamber) (12/01/2024)
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
Chamber in view of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007 (for short, ‘the Rules of 2007’).
Page 2 of 2
(Rev.Pet.No.4/2024)
documents.
Sd/Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge
Soma
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition discloses any error apparent on the face of the record warranting review.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007Applied¶19
Deputy Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Chhattisgarh region
Deputy Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Jabalpur Region
Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Mahasamund
Chumki Saha
Union of India
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Radhakishan Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
