Central Silk Board, v. Suyash Kanti Ghosh
Review – Rule 90(2), High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (NAFR), REVP No. 193 of 2024, Order in Chamber dated 04/10/2024 by Sanjay K. Agrawal and Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, JJ., order running under Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. Petitioners: Central Silk Board (Ministry of Textiles), Director Basic Silkworm Seed Organisation, Scientist-D Basic Seed Multiplication and Training Centre (Raigarh), Member Secretary C.S.B. Respondent: Suyash Kanti Ghosh. Petition sought review/recall of judgment dated 3-4-2024 in W.P.(S)No.2977/2019. Held: no error apparent on the face of record, no sufficient cause for review; dismissed in limine under Rule 90(2); no order as to cost(s). Keywords: Rule 90(2), review in limine, error apparent on the face of record, Central Silk Board, silkworm seed.
What did the court decide?
Having gone through the record of the review petition, the documents annexed therewith and the judgment under review, the Court found no error apparent on the face of the record warranting review of the judgment dated 3-4-2024 passed in W.P.(S)No.2977/2019.