Santosh Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant was not represented on two consecutive hearing dates despite the case being passed over.
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant was not represented on two consecutive hearing dates despite the case being passed over.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3603 of 2024
VERSUS
------- Non-applicant
For Applicant : None for the applicant For Non-applicant-State : Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, Panel Lawyer
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
15/07/2024
Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Dey
Santosh Sahu
State of Chhattisgarh through the Station House Officer, Police Station Hirri
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court