Dismissed¶¶38

Mohan Lal v. Raghushankar

Chhattisgarh HC14 Feb 2024MCC/293/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur; MCC No. 293 of 2020; Mohan Lal v. Raghushankar & ors. (22 non-applicants incl. State of Chhattisgarh); single-judge order of Sanjay K. Agrawal, J., dated 15.02.2024; MCC dismissed for want of prosecution after two call-ups with no appearance for the applicant; State represented by G.A. Rahul Tamaskar; no substantive adjudication, no statutes or precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

As the matter was called up twice for hearing and none appeared for the applicant(s), the Court was left with no other option but to dismiss the instant MCC for want of prosecution. ¶¶37

Mohan Lal Vs Raghushankar — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 (MCC No. 293 of 2020)

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 293 of 2020

¶4

Mohan Lal S/o Tarachand Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Lataipali, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Raghushankar S/o Ramdayal Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Lataipali, Bayang, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶8

Smt. Kamla D/o Ramdayal Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Lataipali, Bhagwanpur, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶9

Smt. Laxmin W/o Udairam Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Lataipali, Sahaspuri, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶10

Smt. Ganga W/o Rampal Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Lataipali, Bhagwanpur, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶11

Smt. Basant W/o Laxman Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Lataipali, Bhagwanpur, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶12

Pyaralal S/o Rameshwar Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Lataipali, Timariaga, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶13

Smt. Phulkunwar Wd/o Jhanak Ram Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Litaipali, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶14

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Raigarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

¶15

Smt. Balmati (Deleted)

¶16

Smt. Prem Kunwar Wd/o Kamta Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Temtema, Tehsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶17

Smt. Pala Bai W/o Nanhuram Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Litaipali, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶18

Bhakulal S/o Sitaram Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Litaipali, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.,

¶19

Raj Kumar S/o Sitaram Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Litaipali, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶20

Makhan S/o Sita Ram Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Litaipali, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶21

Mehattar S/o Nanki Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Litaipali, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶22

Goverdhan Das S/o Girdhari Das Aged About 33

¶23

¶24

(MCC No. 293 of 2020)

¶25

Years R/o Village Litaipali, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶26

Nanki Ram S/o Tarachand Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Litaipali, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶27

Bhuneshwar S/o Kunuram Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Litaipali, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶28

Uttam Singh S/o Daniram Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Bardaputi, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶29

Nanki S/o Tarachand Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Lataipali, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶30

Smt. Lalmati Wd/o Tarachand Aged About 71 Years R/o Village Lataipali, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶31

Smt. Jalkunwar Wd/o Mani Ram Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Kanmura, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶32

---- Non-applicants

¶33

(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)

¶34

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant :- None in two rounds. For State :- Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, G.A.

¶35

SBHon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

¶36

15.02.2024

¶37

The matter was called up twice for hearing but none appeared for the applicant(s). In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the instant MCC for want of prosecution.

¶38

Accordingly, the instant MCC is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶39

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶40

@d!t!

Mohan Lal v. Raghushankar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Lal v. Raghushankar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chhatra Nath (Since Dead) Vs Smt. Rewati Bai (Since Dead)

Balbeer Singh Chawla Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Chandrashekhar Prasad Mishra Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Sona Bai Dhritlahre, Vs Sumitra Dhritlahre

Gaindram Vs Bodhan

Suresh Chandra Vimla Devi Taparia (H.U.F) Vs Mr. Mayank Chaturvedi