Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2
CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Digitally signed by CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Date: 2024.11.19 17:38:49 +0530
MCC No. 1049 of 2024
... Petitioner
versus
... Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Anumeh Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Aniket Verma, Advocate appears on behalf of No. 1 & 2. Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal
Order on Board
2 / 2
19/11/2024
-Sd/-
(Sanjay S. Agrawal ) Judge
Chandrakant
Yogesh Pathak
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Onkar Mourya
Ku. Neelima Jyotshi
Sanjay S. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
