The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dismissed an insurance appeal for want of prosecution because none of the appellants appeared on the first or second call for the hearing.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2
2024:CGHC:33927
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MAC No. 1271 of 2024
... Appellants/Claimants.
versus
... Respondent.
For Appellants : None.
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
Order On Board
03/09/2024
2 / 2
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
Judge
Avinash
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the appellants.
Hemlata Malakar
Balram Malakar
Tata AIG Insurance Company Limited
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
