Disposed

Laxman Singh Siddhu v. Yuvraj Dipak

Chhattisgarh HC8 Mar 2024MAC/126/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh, sitting as National Lok Adalat, accepted a voluntary settlement between the parties. It directed the insurance company to pay Rs. 2,80,000/- as additional compensation within 60 days, failing which interest at 6% per annum would apply.

What did the court decide?

Compromise accepted; Insurance company directed to pay Rs. 2,80,000/- within 60 days with 6% interest on default.

Laxman Singh Siddhu Vs Yuvraj Dipak — Motor Accident Claims | Chhattisgarh HC (2024)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶4

Judge-Lok Adalat : Hon’ble Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma Member-Lok Adalat : Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Senior Advocate

¶5

MAC No. 126 of 2023

¶6

1 - Laxman Singh Siddhu S/o Late Jaswant Singh Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No.09, Shankar Nagar Mulla, Thana And Tahsil Bhanupratappur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker ............(Claimant), Chhattisgarh

¶7

---- Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

1 - Yuvraj Dipak S/o Late Jairam Dipak Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Nawagaon Antagarh, Thana And Tahsil Antagarh, District Uttar Bastar Kanker ..........(Driver Of Vehicle Truck No. Cg-19-Bh-6675), Chhattisgarh

¶10

2 - Rajwanti Chakra W/o Late Musailal Chakra Aged About 60 Years Uparwara Antagarh, Thana And Tahsil Antagarh, District Uttar Bastar Kanker ...........(Owner Of Vehicle Truck No. Cg-19-Bh-6675), Chhattisgarh

¶11

3 - Chola Mandalam M.S. General Insurance Co. Ltd. Simran Tower, 2nd Floor, In-Front Of L.I.C. Building, Vidhan Sabha Road, Pandri Raipur ...........(Insurer Of Vehicle Truck No. C. G. 19-Bh-6675), Chhattisgarh

¶12

---- Respondents

¶13

For Appellant(s) : Mr. A.L. Singroul, Advocate For Res.No.3/Insurance Company : Mr. Nilesh Kumar Thakur, Adv.

¶14

Order

¶15

(Passed on 09^th March 2024)

¶16

The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably and voluntarily settled/compromised the dispute, which is subject matter of this appeal. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal. There is no legal impediment to the said compromise and hence it is acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed by the parties and order that the respondent No.3/Cholamandlam MS General Insurance

¶17

Company Ltd. shall pay Rs. 2,80,000/- (Rs. Two Lacs Eighty Thousands only) to the claimants/appellants by way of compensation in addition to the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal within 60 days from the date of receipt of the order. In case the amount is not paid within stipulated time then the interest @ 6% per annum from the date of passing of this compromise award shall also be payable till its realization.

¶18

Copy of this award should be provided free of cost to the parties immediately. All other terms and conditions, if any, shall remain same as per the order passed by the Tribunal.

¶19

Sd/Sd/(Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ashish Shrivastava) Judge -Lok Adalat Member – Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur

¶20

Rahul

Laxman Singh Siddhu v. Yuvraj Dipak

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laxman Singh Siddhu v. Yuvraj Dipak

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kamla Vs Vikas

Rahul Gandhi Vs Sanjay Ramchandani

Chandro Netam Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Akhilesh Goswami Vs Hemlal Sahu

Smt. Nammi Bai Vs Ritesh Kumar Pawar

Smt. Dhankunwar Vs Ritesh Kumar Pawar