Tamradhwaj Jaiswal v. Shiv Prasad Rohidas
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; death of sole appellant Tamradhwaj Jaiswal during pendency; no substitution application filed by legal representatives; MAC No. 1167 of 2016; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Justice Radhakishan Agrawal; order dated 27/11/2024; NAFR; information conveyed by Mr. Pravin Kumar Tulsyan, Advocate; respondents Shiv Prasad Rohidas, Mahendra Kumar Yadav and Branch Manager, The Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. represented by Sourabh Sharma and Saurabh Gupta; no statutes or precedents cited; no monetary award.
What did the court decide?
Since the sole appellant died and his legal representatives did not file any substitution application, the Court held it had no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. ¶18