Surendra Sharma v. Smt. Priyanka Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
An appeal was dismissed as the appellant had made no appearance and left without instructions to the counsel.
An appeal was dismissed as the appellant had made no appearance and left without instructions to the counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1
2024:CGHC:48510-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 317 of 2023
1 - Surendra Sharma S/o Rajkumar Sharma Aged About 34 Years Resident Of House No. C.H. 2275, Veer Savarkar Nagar, Heerapur, Tatibandh, Raipur (C.G.)
--- Appellant
versus
1 - Smt. Priyanka Sharma D/o Sadhuram Sharma Aged About 29 Years Resident Of House No. Md-152, Veer Savarkar Nagar, Heerapur, Tatibandh, Raipur (C.G.)
--- Respondent
_________________________________________________________________
For Appellant: Mr. Aditya Khare, Advocate.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey, J. Hon’ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru, J. Order on Board
Per, Rajani Dubey, J.
10.12.2024
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Rajani Dubey)
(Bibhu Datta Guru)
JUDGE JUDGE
AMIT PATEL
Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL Date: 2024.12.10 05:50:52 +0530
Surendra Sharma
Smt. Priyanka Sharma
Rajani Dubey
Bibhu Datta Guru
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court