Wife appellant sought withdrawal of her matrimonial appeal; the court allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2
RAHUL JHA
Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2024.12.09 13:40:48 +0530
2024:CGHC:47986-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 216 of 2022
1 - Smt. Kiran Dewangan W/o Bholaram Dewangan Aged About 25 Years C/o House Of Purushottam Sahu, Gudrupara Ward No. 18, Purana Ravan Bhatha, Mahasamund Tahsil And, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
versus
1 - Bholaram Dewangan S/o Shri Khilavan Dewangan Aged About 29 Years R/o Ward 28, Mouhari Bhatha, Mahasamund, Tahsil And, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
2 - Purushottam Sahu S/o Late Thanuram Sahu Aged About 28 Years Occupation Government Employee, R/o Ward No. 18, Gudrupara, Tahsil And, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
For Appellant : Ms. Prachi Singh, Advocate For Respondent : None.
Hon’ble Smt. Rajani Dubey, Judge
Hon’ble Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge
Order on Board
05/12/2024
2 / 2
well as the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, I.A.
No. 02 is allowed.
Sd/Sd/(Rajani Dubey) (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE JUDGE
Rahul
Smt. Kiran Dewangan
Bholaram Dewangan
Purushottam Sahu
Rajani Dubey
Bibhu Datta Guru
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
