Prop. Gourishankar Rice Mill v. Shiv Kumar Agrawal
Chhattisgarh HCFA/362/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 362 of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
1
¶2
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
¶3
FA No. 362 of 2018
¶4
PROP. GOURISHANKAR RICE MILL versus SHIV KUMAR AGRAWAL
¶5
| Order Sheet | |
|---|---|
| 01.10.2024 | Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Malay Shrivastava, counsel for the appellant. |
| Siddhant | Mr. Sandeep Patel, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for respondent. Mr. Sahu would submit that the sole proprietor, namely, Mr. Manoj Kumar Agrawal has expired. He is granted 10 days’ time to move appropriate application, failing which, the instant appeal shall be dismissed without further reference to the Bench. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
PROP. GOURISHANKAR RICE MILL
- respondent
SHIV KUMAR AGRAWAL
Coram
AI extract
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- FA/362/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court