Dismissed¶¶23

Smt. Biram Bai v. Smt. Kalindari Bai Sahu

Chhattisgarh HC24 Sept 2024FA/20/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; FA No. 20 of 2020; Biram Bai vs Kalindari Bai Sahu & others (incl. Steel Authority of India Ltd., State Bank of India); order dated 25/09/2024 by Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari; appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to repeated non-appearance of appellant; no merits adjudicated; no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Since none appeared on behalf of the appellant when the matter was called out, even in the second round, the Court had no option except to dismiss the Appeal for want of prosecution. ¶¶22

Smt. Biram Bai Vs Smt. Kalindari Bai Sahu — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

1 / 2

2024:CGHC:37916

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

FA No. 20 of 2020

¶6

Smt. Biram Bai Wd/o Bisnath Sahu Aged About 51 Years (Father's Name Mangaluram Sahu Resident Of Village Mohandi Post Nardha Tahsil Dhamdha District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶7

...Appellant

¶8

versus

¶9

1. Smt. Kalindari Bai Sahu Wd/o Late Bisnath Sahu Aged About 56 Years Occupation Agriculturist, Resident Of Village And Post Pouwara, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶10

2. Dhaneshwar Sahu aged 35, S/o Late Shri Bisnath Sahu Resident Of Village Mohandi Post Nardha Tahsil Dhamdha District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶11

3. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. Bhilai Steel Plant, Through- Assistant Manager (Personal P And E) Water MGMT Department BSP Bhilai District- Durg Chhattisgarh

¶12

4. State Bank Of India Through- Branch Manager Branch Industrial Estate, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶13

5. Pradeep Sahu S/o Late Shri Bisnath Sahu Aged About 41 Years Resident Of Village And Post Pouwara, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶14

2 / 2

¶15

6. Smt. Warini Sahu D/o Late Shri Bisnath Sahu Aged About 32 Years Through- W/o Shri Rewa Ram Sahu, Resident Of Village Satra, Post Marra, Tahsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶16

7. Smt. Sunita Sahu D/o Late Shri Bisnath Aged About 29 Years Through W/o Shri Nagesh Sahu, Resident Of Village Dhanora, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

For Appellant	: None
For Respondent No.4	: Mr. Robin Arya Lall, Advocate appears
	on behalf of Mr. D.L. Dewangan,
	Advocate
For Respondents No.1, 5 & 7	: Ms. Sweksha Sharma, Advocate appears
	on behalf of Ms. Aditi Singhvi, Advocate

¶19

Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board

¶20

25/09/2024

¶21

1. When the matter is called out none appears on behalf of the appellant. Even in the second round, none appeared.

¶22

2. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this Appeal for want of prosecution.

¶23

3. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge

¶26

Priyanka

Smt. Biram Bai v. Smt. Kalindari Bai Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Biram Bai v. Smt. Kalindari Bai Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rananjay Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chhabi Agrawal Vs Sandeep Agrawal

Ajay Mahajan Vs Smt. Aruna Dighraskar

Masat Ram (Since Dead) through Lrs- (a) Mus. Sukhmani Bai Vs Parasnath Gupta

Laxminarayan Vs Indira Bai

Rajkumar Vs Dwasram