This order disposes of a petition for extension of time to comply with earlier directions for expeditious disposal of a criminal trial. The court directed the Registrar General to ensure no court remains vacant and equal case distribution, and the District Judge to ensure efficient summons management.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 643 of 2024
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner For State
Ms. Prabha Sharma, Advocate Ms. Pragya Shrivastava, Deputy GA
SB.: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board
19/3/2024
“Accordingly, the application is rejected at this juncture. However, the concerned Court below is directed to proceed with the matter in such a manner that at an interval of every 15 days, the trial be conducted in de die in diem manner preferably within next 8 months. However, if the trial is not concluded within the stipulated period, then the Applicant would be at liberty to revive his prayer for bail.”
2
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Priyanka
2 issues framed by the court
Whether further time should be granted to the trial court to adhere to expeditious disposal directions.
Whether vacancy of the trial court and delay in compliance of earlier directions require additional monitoring directions.
Lokeshwar Singh Thakur
State Of Chhattisgarh
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
