Disposed

Anil Kumar Singh v. Ramesh Kumar Singh

Chhattisgarh HC22 Aug 2024CRMP/2112/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing a regular acquittal appeal. Special leave was granted, and the Cr.M.P. was disposed of after directing notice issuance to the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of 137 days delay; special leave to appeal granted; case registered as regular acquittal appeal and notice directed.

Anil Kumar Singh Vs Ramesh Kumar Singh — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Chhattisgarh HC (2024)

¶1

2024:CGHC:32198 NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶3

CRMP No. 2112 of 2024

¶4

Anil Kumar Singh S/o Late Shri Sumer Singh Aged About 52 Years Caste Kshatriya, R/o Village Odgee Kenapara, Ward No. 03, Sagarpara Road, Baikuntpur, Police Station And Tehsil Baikuntpur, District Koriya, C.G.

¶5

... Petitioner

¶6

versus

¶7

Ramesh Kumar Singh S/o Sonalal Singh Aged About 40 Years Caste Gond, Occupation Service In The Uco Bank, Branch Baikunthpur, R/o - Village Targawa, Gotiyapara Kasra, Police Station Patna, Tehsil Baikuntpur, District Koriya, C.G., Present Address- Dabripara, Ward No. 7, C/o - Rented Home At Prakash Chandra Gupta @ Lucky Gupta, Police Station And Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya, C.G.

¶8

... Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Verma, Advocate For Respondent : None

¶10

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma)

¶11

Order On Board

¶12

23/08/2024

¶13

Heard on IA No. 01/2024, an application fro condonation of delay in filing of the instant appeal.

¶14

On due consideration and for the reasons assigned therein, I am inclined to allow the same.

¶15

Delay of 137 days in filing of the instant appeal is hereby condoned.

¶16

Accordingly, IA No. 01/2024 is allowed and is disposed of.

¶17

The present petition has been filed under Section 419(4) of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of special leave to appeal.

¶18

Petition being arguable is admitted for consideration.

¶19

Perused the impugned judgment and gone through the other material available on record.

¶20

On due consideration, the application is allowed and leave is granted. Registry is directed to register the present Cr.M.P. as regular acquittal appeal.

¶21

After registration issue notice to the respondent on payment of process fee, as per rules.

¶22

Notice be made returnable within six weeks.

¶23

In view of above, the present CRMP stand disposed of.

¶24

List this case after service upon the respondent.

sd/-

(Arvind Kumar Verma)

JUDGE

alfiza

Anil Kumar Singh v. Ramesh Kumar Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Singh v. Ramesh Kumar Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Tulsi Ram

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Atul Bagga

Om Prakash Vs Smt. Saroj Dhruw

P.K. Agrawal Vs Sitaram Gupta

Shiv Shakti Krishi Kendra Dhamdha, Proprietor- Gaukaran Giri Goswami, Vs Abhimanyu Tamrakar

Sai Construction Vs Smt. Manisha Pathak