Application for special leave under Section 378(4) CrPC against acquittal in a cheque dishonour complaint dismissed for want of adjournment. Leave was granted and the Registry directed to register the matter as a regular acquittal appeal.
Leave to file the acquittal appeal granted; Registry directed to register the case as a regular Acquittal Appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 1735 of 2023
S.K. Jain Versus G. Sai Krishna
| 19.04.2024 | Mr. Anil S. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant. |
|---|---|
| R. Mandavi | Mr. Amir Khan, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. T. K. Jha, learned counsel for the respondent. This is an application under Section 378(4) of CrPC for special leave to appeal against the order of acquittal. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the learned trial Court has rejected the application for adjournment and has dismissed the compliant case filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. For the reason mentioned in the application, the same is allowed, the leave to file the Acquittal Appeal is granted to the applicant. The Registry is directed to register the case as regular Acquittal Appeal and list it in next week. The CRMP is disposed off. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether special leave under Section 378(4) CrPC should be granted to appeal against the acquittal in a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S.K. Jain
G. Sai Krishna
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
