16. Now, the question is, as to whether there is any corroborative piece of evidence available on record, for which, the trial Court has held that prior to the date and time of the incident, some quarrel has taken place between the appellant and the deceased. However, that would not help the prosecution in any manner and, accordingly, it cannot be held that the appellant is the author of the crime simply on the basis that the appellant was seen by three res gestea witness, namely, PW-1 Sumitra Bai, PW2 Madhav Sori and PW-3 Sukhdeo Sori. Furthermore, in shape of corroboration, the learned trial Court has relied upon the FSL report (Ex.P/24), wherein it has been opined that stains of human blood were found in the arrow, which was seized from the dead body of the deceased. Further, from the possession of the appellant, one bow has been seized which has not been sent for the FSL examination. In absence of which, same is of no help to the prosecution. Consequently, only on the basis of statements of res gestea witnesses and in absence of any other piece of corroborative evidence, the appellant cannot be held guilty for committing offence of murder of the deceased and he is entitled
