Appeal filed against conviction and sentence of the appellant for rape-related offences. The High Court noted the appellant had already served his sentence due to remission. The appeal was dismissed as the trial Court's findings were not perverse or unreasonable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:CGHC:44578
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRA No. 1723 of 2017
versus
... Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board
14.11.2024
| Conviction | Sentence |
|---|---|
| U/s 363 of Indian : |
R.I. for 3 years and fine of Rs. 500/- in default |
| Penal Code | ofpayment of fine 6 months additional R.I. |
2
| U/s 366 of Indian Penal Code |
: R.I. for 5 years and fine of Rs. 500/- in default ofpayment of fine 6 months additional R.I. |
|---|---|
| U/s 506 of Indian Penal Code |
R.I. for 3 years and fine of Rs. 500/- in default ofpayment of fine 6 months additional R.I. |
| U/s 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 |
R.I. for 10 years and fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine 6 months additional R.I. |
3
Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Manish
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the conviction and sentence of the appellant in rape-related offences are unreason?
Whether the finding of the trial Court warrants interference in this criminal appeal?
Santosh Rajwade
The State Of Chhattisgarh
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
