Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel for both parties submitted that it had become infructuous. No substantive decision of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(CONT No. 694/2020)
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 694 of 2020
Anand Kumbhkar S/o Shri Panchuram Kumbhkar Aged About 32 Years Kumharpara, Ward No. 15, Kawardha, Police Station And Tahsil- Kawardha, DistrictKabirdham, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
Mr. Satyendra Kumar Pandey, Regional Manager, Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank, Regional Office G.E. Road Near Mundra Kunj, Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
(Cause title taken from the Case Information System)
For Petitioner :- Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent :- Mr. Raj Shengale, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
05.01.2024
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
@d!t!
Anand Kumbhkar
Mr. Satyendra Kumar Pandey, Regional Manager, Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
