Dismissed¶21

Santosh Kumar Majji v. Mr. Rajendra Kumar Katara

Chhattisgarh HC14 Jan 2024CONT/665/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt; alleged non-compliance of interim stay order dated 02.02.2023 in W.P.(S) No.1008/2023; Collector, Bijapur order dated 16.01.2023 (Annexure P-1); cancellation of appointment of Ex Ward Boy by CMHO, Bijapur order dated 20.01.2023 (Annexure C-3); Santosh Kumar Majji v. Rajendra Kumar Katara and Ajay Ramteke; High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur; Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.; no case for contempt; contempt case closed; 15.01.2024.

What did the court decide?

None ¶21

Santosh Kumar Majji Vs Mr. Rajendra Kumar Katara — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 (CONT No. 665/2023)

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 665 of 2023

¶4

Santosh Kumar Majji S/o Masa Ram Aged About 22 Years Occupation Ex Ward Boy, District Hospital Bijapur, R/o Tadmed, Post Kutru, Tahsil Bhairamgarh, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh.

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Mr. Rajendra Kumar Katara Aged About 40 Years, (Ias) Collector Bijapur, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

Mr. Ajay Ramteke Aged About 45 Years, Chief Medical And Health Officer Bijapur, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

---- Respondents

¶10

(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)

¶11

For Petitioner :- Mr. Ashutosh Rathore, Counsel For Respondent :- Ms. Astha Shukla , Counsel

¶12

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

¶13

15.01.2024

¶14

Heard.

¶15

The instant contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of an interim order dated 02.02.2023, passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.1008/2023.

¶16

This Court by order dated 02.02.2023, directed as under:-

¶17

“Considering submissions made by counsel for petitioner, as also pleading

¶18

2 (CONT No. 665/2023)

¶19

made in writ petition, purely as an interim measure, it is directed that effect and operation of order Annexure P-1 dated 16.01.2023, shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing.”

¶20

A conjoint reading of the above quoted order along with the material available on record would show that before the order in question could be passed on 02.02.2023, the Chief Medical & Health Officer, Bijapur has already canceled the appointment of the petitioner by order dated 20.01.2023 (Annexure C-3), which was in compliance of the order of Collector, Bijapur dated 16.01.2023. However, the said order dated 16.01.2023 was subject matter of challenge in WPS No. 1008/2023 and it is always open for the petitioner to challenge the order dated 20.01.2023 (Annexure C-3) in the said writ petition, if not already done.

¶21

In that view of the matter, no case for contempt is made out. Accordingly, the instant contempt case is closed.

¶22

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶23

s@if/@d!t!

Santosh Kumar Majji v. Mr. Rajendra Kumar Katara

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar Majji v. Mr. Rajendra Kumar Katara

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Rukhmani Devi Vs Dhananjay Devangan (Ias)

Charan (Since Died Therefore through Legal Representatives) Vs Laxaminya (Died and Deleted)

Ramlal Thawait (Died) Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sukran Kumar Rajak Vs Rajiv Jaiswal

Sukran Kumar Rajak Vs Rajiv Jaiswal

Sukran Kumar Rajak Vs Rajiv Jaiswal